X Corp. informs Delhi High Court of imposter misusing Delhi Police name to block IFF, SFLC handles

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 6 November 2026

Case: X Corp. v. Union of India and Ors.
Court: High Court of Delhi
Source: Bar & Bench

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

X Corp. informed the Delhi High Court that an imposter misused the Delhi Police's name to get the Twitter handles of the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) and Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) blocked. This disclosure was made during proceedings concerning account blocking requests.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The court's ratio decidendi is not explicitly stated as this is a report on a submission made to the court, not a final judgment. However, the underlying principle being addressed is the due process and verification required for account blocking requests, especially when made by law enforcement.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should verify the authenticity of requests from law enforcement agencies for account blocking. Litigants whose accounts are blocked should inquire about the requesting authority and the process followed.

Key Legal Takeaways

1An imposter used the Delhi Police's name to request account blocks.
2The accounts of IFF and SFLC were affected.
3X Corp. disclosed this to the Delhi High Court.
4The incident highlights issues with verifying official requests for content removal.

The Legal Issue During proceedings before the Delhi High Court, X Corp. (formerly Twitter) revealed that an individual had impersonated the Delhi Police to request the blocking of Twitter accounts belonging to the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) and the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC). This issue arose in the context of broader litigation concerning the blocking of accounts and content on the platform, often at the behest of government authorities.

Court's Reasoning The court's reasoning is not detailed as this report focuses on X Corp.'s submission rather than a judicial pronouncement on the merits of the impersonation. However, the disclosure by X Corp. indicates a concern regarding the authenticity and verification processes for requests made to social media platforms for content or account removal. The court would likely consider the implications of such impersonation on free speech and due process.

What Follows The Delhi High Court will likely examine the procedures for verifying requests from law enforcement agencies to block accounts. This incident may lead to stricter protocols for platforms like X Corp. to confirm the legitimacy of such requests before acting upon them, potentially impacting future account blocking decisions and the legal framework governing content moderation.