Supreme Court hears appeal regarding medical unfitness for UP Police Constable recruitment due to squint eye

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 3 November 2026

Case: Akanksha Devi vs State Of Up
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR, J.
Decided: 2 November 2026
Statutes: UP Police Constable and Head Constable Service Rules, 2015 — s.15(6)(d)
Source: Indian Kanoon (Supreme Court)

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In Akanksha Devi vs State Of Up, the Supreme Court of India, on 2026-11-02, heard an appeal concerning the recruitment of the appellant to the post of Constable Civil Police. The appellant was declared medically unfit due to a squint eye, as per Rule 15(6)(d) of the UP Police Constable and Head Constable Service Rules, 2015, as amended in 2017.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The legal principle under consideration is the application and interpretation of medical fitness criteria, specifically regarding 'squint eye', for recruitment to the post of Constable Civil Police under the UP Police Constable and Head Constable Service Rules, 2015.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should meticulously review the specific medical fitness rules and their amendments applicable to recruitment processes. Litigants should be prepared for multiple stages of medical examination and re-examination, and understand the grounds for rejection.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Medical fitness is a critical stage in police recruitment.
2Specific rules, like Rule 15(6)(d) of the UP Police Constable and Head Constable Service Rules, 2015, govern medical standards.
3Candidates declared unfit have avenues for re-examination by a Division Medical Board.

The Legal Issue The appeal before the Supreme Court of India in Akanksha Devi vs State Of Up concerns the recruitment of the appellant to the post of Constable Civil Police under the U.P. Police Constable Civil Direct Recruitment, 2023. The core issue revolves around the appellant being declared medically unfit due to an alleged defect in her eyes (squint eye), which led to her rejection after both initial and re-medical examinations.

Court's Reasoning The appellant successfully cleared the Document Verification (DV) and Physical Standard Test (PST) and was included in the qualified list for the next phase. She was subsequently called for a medical examination on 22.04.2025, where she was orally informed of her unfitness due to a squint eye. Following this, a re-examination was conducted by the Division Medical Board on 25.04.2025, as per Rule 15(6)(d) of the UP Police Constable and Head Constable Service Rules, 2015, as amended in 2017. This re-examination also declared her medically unfit on the same grounds.

What Follows The Supreme Court has heard the matter and granted leave. The appeal will proceed to consider the validity of the medical unfitness declaration based on the 'squint eye' condition under Rule 15(6)(d) of the UP Police Constable and Head Constable Service Rules, 2015, as amended in 2017.