Supreme Court hears appeal against Delhi High Court's interim order on principal amount payment

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 29 October 2026

Case: M/S Royal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd vs M/S National Projects Construction
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Vikram Nath, J.
Citation: Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No. 14005 of 2026
Decided: 28 October 2026
Statutes: Constitution of India — s.134-A, s.133(1)(a)
Source: Indian Kanoon (Supreme Court)

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In M/S Royal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd vs M/S National Projects Construction, the Supreme Court on 2026-10-28 heard an appeal against an interim order of the Delhi High Court. The High Court had granted liberty to parties to seek clarification from the Supreme Court regarding the non-disclosure of principal amount payment in 2009, which was relevant to a substantial question of law framed under Article 134-A read with Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal an interim order of the High Court which sought clarification from the Supreme Court itself regarding a fact not brought to its notice during an earlier consideration of a substantial question of law.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should ensure all material facts, especially those concerning payments, are brought to the court's attention at the earliest opportunity. Litigants may face further proceedings if material facts are not disclosed in prior stages, potentially leading to appeals against interim orders seeking clarification.

Key Legal Takeaways

1The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal an interim order.
2The Delhi High Court's interim order sought clarification from the Supreme Court.
3The clarification concerned the non-disclosure of principal amount payment in 2009.
4The issue related to a substantial question of law under Article 134-A read with Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The Legal Issue The Supreme Court of India, in the case of M/S Royal Construction Company Pvt. Ltd vs M/S National Projects Construction, heard an appeal against an interim order dated 16th February, 2026, passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Execution First Appeal (Original Side) No. 17 of 2018. The core issue revolved around the High Court granting liberty to the parties to seek clarification from the Supreme Court regarding a crucial fact: the principal amount had already been paid in Indian Rupees in 2009, pursuant to earlier High Court orders. This fact had not been brought to the Supreme Court's notice when it previously considered and answered a substantial question of law framed by the High Court under Article 134-A read with Article 133(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

Court's Reasoning Justice Vikram Nath, speaking for the Supreme Court, granted leave in the Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) No. 14005 of 2026. The Court proceeded to hear arguments from Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, counsel for the appellant, and Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, Additional Solicitor General, for the respondent. The grant of leave indicates the Supreme Court's decision to examine the High Court's interim order, which essentially sought the Supreme Court's own clarification on a matter of fact that was seemingly overlooked in prior proceedings before the apex court.

What Follows The Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal, meaning the appeal against the Delhi High Court's interim order will now be heard on its merits. The parties will need to present their arguments regarding the High Court's decision to seek clarification from the Supreme Court itself and the implications of the non-disclosure of the principal payment in 2009 on the substantial question of law previously decided. The outcome will determine whether the High Court's approach of seeking clarification from the Supreme Court on a previously unstated fact is upheld or set aside.