Madras HC hears anticipatory bail petition under BNSS for BNS and IT Act offences

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 28 October 2026

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In A Subramanian v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police, the Madras High Court heard a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS. The petitioner was accused in Crime No. 242 of 2026 for offences under Sections 75(1)(i), 79, 64(2)(a)(i), 64(2)(m), 308(6), 118(1), 351(3) of the BNS and Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The excerpt does not state the court's reasoning or a legal principle applied, only the facts of the petition.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should note the specific sections of the BNS and IT Act that can be added during investigation. Litigants seeking anticipatory bail for offences committed after 1 July 2024 will file petitions under the BNSS.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Anticipatory bail petitions for offences committed after 1 July 2024 are filed under Section 482 of the BNSS.
2Multiple sections of the BNS can be added to a case during the investigation phase.
3The Information Technology Act can be invoked alongside the BNS for certain offences.

The Legal Issue This case concerns a petition for anticipatory bail filed by A Subramanian before the Madras High Court. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No. 242 of 2026, registered at the Karaikal Town Police Station, Karaikal, Puducherry. The original First Information Report (FIR) was registered on 29.09.2026 for alleged offences under Sections 75(1)(i) and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 67-A of the Information Technology Act. Subsequently, during the investigation, additional sections of the BNS were added by a report dated 14.10.2026 filed before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Karaikal. The added sections include 64(2)(a)(i), 64(2)(m), 308(6), 118(1), and 351(3) of the BNS. The petition for anticipatory bail was filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

Court's Reasoning The provided excerpt details the procedural posture of the case, specifically the filing of an anticipatory bail petition and the sections of law invoked. It does not contain the court's reasoning or any decision on the merits of the anticipatory bail application. The information focuses on the charges faced by the petitioner and the legal provisions under which the petition was moved.

What Follows The Madras High Court is hearing the anticipatory bail petition filed by A Subramanian. The outcome of this petition, including whether anticipatory bail is granted or denied, is not stated in the provided text. The proceedings will continue under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the offences alleged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Information Technology Act, 2000.