Gujarat High Court raps Vadodara Collector for affidavit making remarks against judge

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 26 October 2026

Case: Not specified in source
Court: High Court of Gujarat
Bench: Not specified in source
Citation: Not specified in source
Source: Bar & Bench

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

The Gujarat High Court strongly criticised the Vadodara Collector for filing an affidavit containing remarks against a sitting High Court judge. The court viewed the remarks as an attempt to scandalise the court and interfere with the administration of justice, ordering the Collector to file a fresh affidavit.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

Remarks made in an affidavit that are critical of or cast aspersions on a sitting judge constitute an attempt to scandalise the court and interfere with the administration of justice.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates must ensure that affidavits filed in court do not contain any remarks or criticisms against judges. Litigants and government officials must exercise extreme caution and respect when submitting documents to the court, avoiding any language that could be construed as contemptuous or an attempt to influence judicial proceedings.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Affidavits must not contain remarks against judges.
2Such remarks are viewed as scandalising the court.
3The court will order rectification and may initiate contempt proceedings.

The Legal Issue The Gujarat High Court addressed the issue of an affidavit filed by the Vadodara Collector that contained remarks against a sitting High Court judge. The court considered whether such remarks amounted to an attempt to scandalise the court and interfere with the administration of justice.

Court's Reasoning The Gujarat High Court expressed strong disapproval of the Vadodara Collector's affidavit. The court observed that the remarks made against a sitting judge were unacceptable and constituted an attempt to scandalise the court. The court viewed this action as a serious interference with the judicial process and the administration of justice. The bench questioned the Collector's audacity in making such statements in a formal court document.

What Follows The Gujarat High Court directed the Vadodara Collector to file a fresh affidavit, ensuring that all objectionable remarks against the judge were removed. The court's order indicates a firm stance against any attempts to undermine the judiciary through inappropriate submissions.