Delhi High Court quashes CIC order directing HC to provide data under RTI on delayed judgments

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 3 November 2026

Case: Not stated in the source
Court: High Court of Delhi
Bench: Not stated in the source
Citation: Not stated in the source
Statutes: Right to Information Act, 2005
Source: Bar & Bench

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

The Delhi High Court quashed a Central Information Commission (CIC) order that directed the High Court to provide data under the Right to Information Act, 2005, regarding delayed judgments. The High Court held that such information falls under the administrative side and cannot be sought under the RTI Act.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

Information pertaining to the administrative functioning of the High Court, specifically regarding the delay in pronouncement of judgments, is not subject to disclosure under the Right to Information Act, 2005, as it pertains to the internal administrative side of the court.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates and litigants should note that information concerning the internal administrative processes of High Courts, such as judgment delays, may not be accessible via RTI requests. RTI applications should focus on information that is not purely administrative or internal to the court's functioning.

Key Legal Takeaways

1CIC orders directing High Courts to disclose administrative data under RTI can be challenged.
2Internal administrative information of High Courts is generally exempt from RTI disclosure.
3The Delhi High Court emphasized the distinction between judicial and administrative functions for RTI purposes.

The Legal Issue The Central Information Commission (CIC) had issued an order directing the Delhi High Court to provide specific data under the Right to Information Act, 2005. This data pertained to the delay in the pronouncement of judgments by the High Court. The High Court challenged this directive, arguing that such information falls under its administrative side and is not subject to disclosure under the RTI Act.

Court's Reasoning The Delhi High Court, in its decision, quashed the CIC's order. The Court reasoned that the information sought, concerning the delay in judgments, relates to the administrative functioning of the High Court. It held that such internal administrative details are not intended to be disclosed under the Right to Information Act, 2005. The High Court distinguished between information related to judicial pronouncements and that concerning the internal administrative management of the court, asserting that the latter is outside the purview of the RTI Act for disclosure.

What Follows As a result of this judgment, the Delhi High Court is not obligated to provide the data on delayed judgments as previously directed by the CIC. This ruling clarifies the scope of the Right to Information Act, 2005, regarding the administrative functions of High Courts, indicating that internal administrative information is generally exempt from disclosure.