significantheadlines
Delhi High Court Directs 'Doosra' Makers To Add Disclaimer Stating Film Doesn't Have Sourav Ganguly's Consent To Use His Name
KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made
Published - Case
- Sourav Ganguly v. Doosra
- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Source
- LiveLaw
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)
The Delhi High Court directed the makers of the film 'Doosra' to include a disclaimer stating that the film does not have Sourav Ganguly's consent to use his name. This order was issued in a case concerning the unauthorized use of a public figure's name and persona.
Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established
The court held that films using a public figure's name without consent must carry a clear disclaimer to avoid misleading the public about the figure's endorsement or involvement.
Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates
Advocates representing public figures should seek injunctions or disclaimers for unauthorized use of their client's persona in creative works. Filmmakers and content creators must ensure proper consent or include explicit disclaimers when referencing public figures to avoid legal disputes.
Key Legal Takeaways
- 1Unauthorized use of a public figure's name in a film can lead to legal action.
- 2Courts may mandate disclaimers to clarify lack of consent or endorsement.
- 3Filmmakers should obtain explicit consent or use clear disclaimers when depicting real individuals.