KanoonHQ™
generalhigh courts

Delhi HC hears appeal against POCSO conviction, acquits appellant of IPC S. 506 offence

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made
Published
Case
Anuj @ Ambuz @ Chhavinder Kumar vs State Nct Of Delhi
Bench
MADHU JAIN, J.
Decided
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In Anuj @ Ambuz @ Chhavinder Kumar vs State Nct Of Delhi, decided on 2026-11-05, the Delhi High Court heard a criminal appeal under Cr.P.C. Section 374(2) against a conviction under Section 10 of the POCSO Act. The appellant was acquitted of the offence under Section 506 of the IPC.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The court heard an appeal against a conviction under Section 10 of the POCSO Act and an acquittal under Section 506 of the IPC, indicating its appellate jurisdiction over such matters.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should note that appeals against convictions under the POCSO Act are heard by the High Court under Cr.P.C. Section 374(2). Litigants should be aware that an acquittal on one charge does not preclude a conviction on another related charge in the same FIR.

Key Legal Takeaways

  • 1Appeals against POCSO convictions are filed under Cr.P.C. Section 374(2).
  • 2A single FIR can lead to convictions under multiple statutes (IPC and POCSO Act).
  • 3Acquittal on one charge (e.g., IPC S. 506) does not automatically affect conviction on another (e.g., POCSO S. 10).

The Legal Issue This criminal appeal, filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), challenged the judgment dated 10.08.2023 and the order on sentence dated 10.10.2023. These orders were passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-01 (POCSO), North West, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, in FIR No. 114/2018. The FIR was registered under Sections 354 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act).

Court's Reasoning The Delhi High Court, presided over by MADHU JAIN, J., heard the appeal. The appellant had been convicted for the offence under Section 10 of the POCSO Act but acquitted for the offence under Section 506 of the IPC. The appeal specifically assailed the conviction under the POCSO Act and the related sentence.

What Follows The Delhi High Court is hearing the criminal appeal against the conviction under Section 10 of the POCSO Act. The outcome of this appeal will determine whether the conviction and sentence are upheld, modified, or set aside. The acquittal under Section 506 of the IPC remains undisturbed as per the information provided.

Read the full judgment