Delhi HC considers challenge to CUET (UG)-2025 subject matching rule for DU admissions

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 4 November 2026

Case: Suvan Yaduvanshi vs University Of Delhi And Ors
Court: High Court of Delhi
Decided: 3 November 2026
Statutes: Constitution of India, 1950 — s.14, s.19(1)(g), s.21, s.226
Source: Indian Kanoon (Delhi HC)

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In Suvan Yaduvanshi v. University of Delhi, the Delhi High Court on 2026-11-03 considered a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought to quash an order denying admission to a BA (Hons) History program and challenged the Delhi University's CUET (UG)-2025 subject matching condition as ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The ratio decidendi is not explicitly stated in the provided excerpt, as the excerpt only details the prayers sought in the writ petition, not the court's decision or reasoning.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should note that challenges to university admission criteria, particularly those based on entrance examinations like CUET, can be brought under Article 226 of the Constitution. Litigants seeking to quash specific administrative orders and general policy conditions can combine these prayers in a single writ petition.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Writ petitions under Article 226 can challenge both specific administrative orders and general policy conditions.
2Challenges to university admission criteria often invoke fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21.
3The CUET (UG) subject matching rule for Delhi University admissions is a point of contention for some petitioners.

The Legal Issue Suvan Yaduvanshi filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the University of Delhi and others. The petition sought two primary reliefs. Firstly, it aimed to quash an order passed by the 1st Respondent (University of Delhi) in REF NO.276058-SHIVAJIBHHS21-460-CW-3-21-I-FA, and consequently direct the allotment of a seat in the BA (Hons) Program (History) at Shivaji College for the academic year 2025-26 to the petitioner. Secondly, the petition challenged a specific condition in the Delhi University's Bulletin of Information 2025 for undergraduate admissions, which mandated candidates to appear in CUET (UG)-2025 in those subjects in which they are appearing/have passed Class XII. This condition was contended to be ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950.

Court's Reasoning The provided excerpt only details the prayers sought by the petitioner and does not contain any reasoning or decision by the Delhi High Court. Therefore, the court's reasoning on the merits of the petition or the constitutional challenge to the CUET (UG) condition cannot be ascertained from this text.

What Follows The excerpt indicates that the matter is before the Delhi High Court as a writ petition. The outcome of the petition, including whether the impugned order will be quashed or the CUET condition will be struck down, is not stated. Further proceedings would involve arguments from both parties and a decision by the High Court on the prayers sought by the petitioner.