Calcutta High Court restrains circulation of Adani defamation video titled "How Modi and Adani Stole India – The Friendship Files"

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 27 October 2026

Case: Adani Group v. YouTube, X, and others
Court: Calcutta High Court
Source: SCC Times

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

The Calcutta High Court restrained the circulation of a defamation video titled "How Modi and Adani Stole India – The Friendship Files" uploaded on YouTube channel "Bcubed (Breaking Boundaries with Sabeer Bhatia)" and posted on X. The Adani Group alleged the video contained false and defamatory imputations against the company and the group.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The court's decision to restrain circulation of the video implies a finding of a prima facie case of defamation and the necessity of injunctive relief to prevent further harm to reputation.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates can seek urgent injunctive relief from High Courts to prevent the circulation of allegedly defamatory content on social media platforms. Litigants should be prepared to demonstrate a prima facie case of defamation and potential irreparable harm.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Courts can issue injunctions against online content platforms for defamation.
2Defamatory content on YouTube and X (formerly Twitter) can be subject to judicial restraint.
3Companies can initiate legal action to protect their reputation against false imputations.

The Legal Issue A suit was filed by the Adani Group alleging that a video titled "How Modi and Adani Stole India – The Friendship Files", uploaded on 9 October 2026 on the YouTube channel "Bcubed (Breaking Boundaries with Sabeer Bhatia)" in collaboration with "Shadow Citizens", and subsequently posted on X, contained false and defamatory imputations against the company and the Adani Group.

Court's Reasoning The Calcutta High Court, upon considering the allegations, found it appropriate to issue an order restraining the circulation of the impugned video. The court's decision indicates a prima facie assessment that the content was indeed defamatory and warranted immediate intervention to prevent further dissemination and potential harm to the reputation of the Adani Group.

What Follows The Calcutta High Court has restrained the circulation of the video. This means that YouTube, X, and other parties involved are prohibited from further publishing or circulating the video titled "How Modi and Adani Stole India – The Friendship Files".