Calcutta HC: Chief Justice to decide if sitting Judge will head Chorebagan stampede inquiry
- Case
- Will a sitting Judge head the Chorebagan stampede inquiry?
- Court
- Calcutta High Court
- Statutes
- Source
- SCC Times
The Calcutta High Court stated that the Chief Justice will decide if a sitting Judge will head the Chorebagan stampede inquiry. If no sitting Judge is available, the State must constitute a Commission headed by a retired Calcutta High Court Judge, in accordance with the Commissions of Inquiry Act.
Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established
The State's power to constitute a Commission of Inquiry for a public matter is subject to the availability of a sitting High Court Judge, with the Chief Justice's decision being determinative. If a sitting Judge is unavailable, a retired High Court Judge may head the Commission.
Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates
Advocates should note that the Chief Justice's discretion is key in appointing a sitting judge to a Commission of Inquiry. Litigants should be aware that the State has a fallback option of appointing a retired judge if a sitting judge is not made available.
Key Legal Takeaways
- 1The Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court has the discretion to make a sitting Judge available for a Commission of Inquiry.
- 2If a sitting Judge is not made available, the State must appoint a retired Calcutta High Court Judge to head the Commission.
- 3The constitution of such a Commission must comply with the Commissions of Inquiry Act.