Bombay High Court to determine compensation and apportionment for land acquired for Shree Siddhivinayak Trust

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 4 November 2026

Case: The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs Shree Siddhivinayk Ganapati Temple ...
Court: Bombay High Court
Decided: 3 November 2026
Source: Indian Kanoon (Bombay HC)

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... vs Shree Siddhivinayak Ganapati Temple ..., decided on 2026-11-03, the Bombay High Court heard multiple Land Acquisition References concerning the determination and apportionment of compensation for land acquired for the Shree Siddhivinayak Trust. The claimants challenged the valuation and apportionment made by the Land Acquisition Officer.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The court will determine the correct amount of compensation and its apportionment among claimants in land acquisition references where the initial award's valuation and division are challenged.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should be prepared to present detailed arguments and evidence regarding land valuation and the respective interests of all claimants in land acquisition cases. Litigants must clearly establish their ownership or interest in the acquired property to claim appropriate compensation.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Multiple land acquisition references with similar facts and law may be heard and decided by a common judgment.
2Claimants can challenge both the amount of compensation and its apportionment in a land acquisition award.
3The court will re-evaluate the valuation and apportionment if the Land Acquisition Officer's award is deemed incorrect.

The Legal Issue This case involves several Land Acquisition References filed by claimants challenging the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer and its apportionment. The core legal issue is the correct determination of compensation and its division among various parties claiming an interest in Final Plot No. 901, T.P.S. IV, Mahim Division, bearing C.S. No. 1/1209 of Lower Parel Division, situated at Prabhadevi, Mumbai. The land, measuring approximately 642.92 square metres and including Sadanand Garage, was acquired for a public purpose connected with the Shree Siddhivinayak Trust.

Court's Reasoning The Bombay High Court noted that the questions of fact and law arising in all the references were similar and interconnected. Therefore, the court decided to hear them together and issue a common judgment to avoid repetition. The claimants in LAR No. 7 of 2004, identified as the Ambekars and owners of the acquired land, specifically contended that both the valuation adopted and the apportionment made in the Land Acquisition Officer's award were incorrect. The court will proceed to examine these contentions.

What Follows The Bombay High Court will now determine the appropriate compensation for the acquired land and its correct apportionment among the claimants, including the Ambekars (owners), M/s. Sadanand Garage, and M/s. Century Developers, after considering the challenges raised against the Land Acquisition Officer's award.