Allahabad High Court hears review application against judgment in Ved Pati Tripathi v. State of U.P.

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 26 October 2026

Case: Ved Pati Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Edu.
Court: Allahabad High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE IRSHAD ALI J.
Decided: 23 October 2026
Statutes: Allahabad High Court Rules — s.Chapter V, Rule 12
Source: Indian Kanoon (Allahabad HC)

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In Ved Pati Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Edu., the Allahabad High Court on 2026-10-23 heard a review application filed under Chapter V, Rule 12 of the Allahabad High Court Rules. The application sought to review and set aside the judgment and order dated 12.08.2026 in Writ-A No.916 of 2005, specifically concerning petitioner no. 1.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The court heard a review application seeking to set aside a previous judgment, indicating the procedural stage of review under the Allahabad High Court Rules.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should be aware of the specific rules for filing review applications, such as Chapter V, Rule 12 of the Allahabad High Court Rules. Litigants seeking to challenge a judgment must adhere to the procedural requirements for review.

Key Legal Takeaways

1Review applications are governed by specific court rules.
2A review application seeks to set aside or modify a previous judgment.
3The application must clearly state the relief sought.

The Legal Issue This matter concerned a review application filed by Ved Pati Tripathi under Chapter V, Rule 12 of the Allahabad High Court Rules. The applicant sought a review of the judgment and order dated 12.08.2026, passed by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE IRSHAD ALI J., in Writ-A No.916 of 2005, titled Ved Pati Tripathi and 2 Others vs. State of U.P. & Others. The specific relief sought was to set aside the impugned judgment dated 12.08.2026, insofar as it related to petitioner no. 1/review petitioner, and to allow the writ petition of the said petitioner with costs.

Court's Reasoning The Allahabad High Court heard arguments from Sri G.C. Verma, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Vishesh Singh Raikwar, for the review applicant. Sri Anand Dubey represented respondent No.5, and Sri Shiv Ganesh Singh, learned Additional CSC, appeared for the State respondents. The court proceeded to hear the review application, which was filed to challenge and potentially overturn a previous decision.

What Follows The court heard the arguments presented by all parties regarding the review application. The outcome of the review application, specifically whether the judgment dated 12.08.2026 will be set aside or modified for petitioner no. 1, will be determined by the court's subsequent order.