Allahabad HC hears appeal against convictions under IPC and SC/ST Act for offences from 2005

KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · AI-generated brief from the source linked below. How briefs are made

Published 28 October 2026

Case: Upendra Yadav And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another
Court: Allahabad High Court
Decided: 24 October 2026
Statutes: Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s.147, s.148, s.308, s.149, s.304, s.323, s.325, s.504, s.506, s.336
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — s.3(2)(v)
Source: Indian Kanoon (Allahabad HC)

Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)

In Upendra Yadav And 4 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another, decided on 2026-10-24, the Allahabad High Court heard an appeal against a judgment dated 08.08.2025. The appellants were convicted under Sections 147, 148, 308/149, 304/149, 323/149, 325/149, 504, 506, 336 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for a 2005 incident.

Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established

The ratio decidendi is not stated in the provided text, as the excerpt only describes the hearing of the appeal and the convictions being challenged.

Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates

Advocates should note the specific sections of the IPC and SC/ST Act under which convictions were made. Counsel must be prepared to argue against or defend convictions for multiple offences arising from a single incident, including those involving common object and specific acts.

Key Legal Takeaways

1The case involves an appeal against convictions under various sections of the IPC and the SC/ST Act.
2The original incident occurred in 2005, leading to a trial and conviction in 2025.
3The appeal challenges sentences including rigorous imprisonment for up to ten years.

The Legal Issue This case concerns criminal appeals filed by eight accused appellants, including Upendra Yadav, challenging a judgment and order dated 8.8.2025, passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Chandauli. The appellants were convicted in Special Sessions Trial No.27 of 2006, arising from Case Crime No.35 of 2005, under Sections 147, 148, 308/149, 304/149, 323/149, 325/149, 504, 506, 336 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The convictions stemmed from an incident that occurred in 2005.

Court's Reasoning The provided text describes the procedural posture of the case, indicating that the Allahabad High Court heard the arguments from counsel representing the appellants, the opposite party no.2, and the State. The court was reviewing the material on record to consider the appeals against the convictions and sentences imposed by the Special Judge. The specific reasoning of the High Court regarding the merits of the appeal is not detailed in this excerpt, as it only states that the appeals were preferred to set aside the impugned judgment and order.

What Follows The appeals are currently being heard by the Allahabad High Court. The outcome of these appeals will determine whether the convictions and sentences imposed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Chandauli, will be upheld, modified, or set aside. The court will issue a judgment after considering the arguments and the record.