Calcutta High Court Clarifies Applicability of New Criminal Codes (BNS, BNSS, BSA) to Civil Proceedings
Verified by KanoonHQ Legal Research Desk
Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)
The Calcutta High Court, in Reyansh Saraiya v. Padam Prakash Gupta, clarified that the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) do not apply to civil proceedings, which continue to be governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The court emphasized the prospective nature of the new criminal codes.
Ratio Decidendi · Legal Principle Established
The BNS, BNSS, and BSA, which replaced the IPC, CrPC, and IEA respectively, are specifically designed for criminal law and procedure and apply prospectively to offences, arrests, and proceedings arising on or after July 1, 2024. They have no bearing on civil suits, which remain under the purview of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Calcutta High Court Clarifies Applicability of New Criminal Codes (BNS, BNSS, BSA) to Civil Proceedings | KanoonHQ Legal Gazette · KanoonHQ
Practice & Procedural Impact for Advocates
Advocates must ensure they cite and apply the correct procedural codes based on the nature (civil or criminal) and date of the cause of action. Litigants in civil matters should be advised that the recent criminal law reforms do not alter the framework for civil litigation. Misapplication of the new criminal codes in civil matters will be rejected by courts.
Key Legal Takeaways
1The BNS, BNSS, and BSA are exclusively for criminal law and procedure.
2The new criminal codes apply prospectively from July 1, 2024.
3Civil proceedings continue to be governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
4The 2023 criminal law reforms do not impact civil litigation.
The Legal Issue
In the case of *Reyansh Saraiya vs Padam Prakash Gupta And Ors.*, the Calcutta High Court addressed a subtle but critical point regarding the applicability of India's newly enacted criminal justice legislation. The core issue, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, implicitly revolved around ensuring clarity on which procedural codes govern civil proceedings following the introduction of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). Given the recent overhaul of criminal laws, there was a need to reiterate that these changes do not extend to the civil justice system.
Court's Reasoning
Justice Arindam Mukherjee, in his judgment dated September 8, 2026, clarified that the BNS, BNSS, and BSA, which replaced the Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, and Indian Evidence Act respectively, are specifically designed to govern criminal law and procedure. The Court emphasized the prospective nature of these new codes, stating that they apply to offences, arrests, and proceedings that arise on or after July 1, 2024. Crucially, the Court affirmed that the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) remains the governing statute for all civil suits and proceedings. The recent criminal law reforms have no impact on the framework or application of civil procedure.
Why It Matters
This clarification from the Calcutta High Court is significant for maintaining judicial clarity and preventing confusion in the legal landscape. It reinforces the distinct separation between criminal and civil jurisprudence. For advocates, it underscores the importance of correctly identifying and applying the relevant procedural code based on the nature of the case and the date of the cause of action. Litigants can be assured that the established civil procedural framework under the CPC remains unchanged, providing stability and predictability in civil disputes. Any attempt to invoke the new criminal codes in civil matters would be a misapplication of law and would not be entertained by the courts.